Sean “Diddy” Combs’legal group has actually submitted a movement to dismiss claims in a suit implicating him of sexually attacking a lady in 1991.
RELATED:Stevie J. Shares Viral Video Of “What A Real Diddy Party Looks Like” (WATCH)
More Details Regarding Diddy’s Reported Response To The Sexual Assault Lawsuit
According to AP NewsCombs’ legal group submitted the movement on Friday, April 26. The music magnate’s legal group is supposedly asserting that Diddy can not be demanded specific claims in the claim since “specific laws didn’t exist” when the events presumably took place in 1991.
Diddy’s legal group is supposedly requesting Joi Dickerson-Neal’s claims about “revenge pornography and human trafficking” to be “dismissed with bias.”
CNN notes that Combs’ lawyers are continuing to identify Dickerson-Neal’s accusations “incorrect, offending, and salacious.” Furthermore, Diddy’s lawyers are supposedly asking that “claims versus Combs’ business” be dismissed. To keep in mind, TMZ reports that the demand describes Diddy’s business, “Bad Boy Records or Bad Boy Entertainment.”
TMZ notes that Diddy’s group has actually not submitted to dismiss the very first “2 counts” in the claim. Those claims declare Combs caused “attack,” battery, and “deliberate infliction of psychological distress” on the complainant.
More Details Regarding The Lawsuit & & Allegations
As The Shade Room formerly reported, Dickerson-Neal submitted the fit versus Combs in November 2023. The fit was apparently submitted under New York’s Adult Survivors Act.
At the time, it was reported that Dickerson-Neal implicated Diddy of sexually attacking her after a date in 1991. Diddy apparently provided the female a drug. Supposedly sexually attacked her at a music studio.
According to AP Newsthe lady implicated Combs of tape-recording the attack. Furthermore, she declared he shared the video with buddies.
In a preliminary action to the suit, a representative for the magnate apparently rejected the claims. In addition, they identified the claims a “cash grab.”
“This last-minute claim is an example of how a well-intentioned law can be switched on its head. Ms. Dickerson’s 32-year-old story is comprised and not trustworthy. Mr. Combs never ever attacked her, and she links business that did not exist. This is simply a cash grab and absolutely nothing more,” their declaration checked out, per New York City Post