Readers Call on Congress to Bolster Medicare and Fix Loopholes in Health Policy

Readers Call on Congress to Bolster Medicare and Fix Loopholes in Health Policy

Letters to the Editoris a routine function. Wewelcome all remarksand will release a choice. We modify for length and clearness and need complete names.


Occupational Therapists Change Lives. CMS Must Better Support Them.

Physical therapists are crucial in assisting clients adapt to brand-new scenarios, empowering them with the tools they require to get rid of barriers and restore control over their lives. Whether you’re transitioning from homelessness into a home (“In Los Angeles, Occupational Therapists Tapped to Help Homeless Stay Housed,” Jan. 24) or relearning how to do daily jobs following a stroke, OTs are crucial to clients’ care strategy.

The vital care offered by OTs is being threatened by another year of payment cuts enforced by Medicare, our country’s health care program for individuals age 65 and up. Numerous older clients dealt with by OTs gain access to insurance protection through Medicare, which usually compensates suppliers at a lower rate than personal insurance providers. And now, with payment cuts that entered into impact on Jan. 1– in spite of cautions and reaction from legislators, clients, and service providers– OTs are having a hard time to provide care with lower Medicare payment.

Buying occupational treatment enhances health results for clients, has the possible to minimize the problem on healthcare facilities and other healthcare clinicians, and keeps people healthy and independent. Medicare’s payment cuts just jeopardize the capability of service providers to provide thorough, caring care. Medicare should acknowledge the long-lasting client advantages occupational treatment needs to provide.

Thankfully, Congress is thinking about a costs that would reverse these hazardous payment cuts. The Preserving Seniors’ Access to Physicians Act of 2023 (HR 6683), would reverse the cuts that entered into impact on Jan. 1, minimizing monetary tension for physical therapists and maintaining client gain access to. I highly advise legislators to focus on and safeguard occupational treatment services and instantly pass HR 6683 for America’s Medicare clients.

— Doug Fosco, a physical therapist practicing at Two Trees Physical Therapy in Ventura, California


An assistant teacher at Ontario’s Western University weighed in on X.

— Carrie Anne Marshall, Sydenham, Ontario


Congress Must Finish the Job on Site-Neutral Payments

There’s an apparent service to control federal government costs and client out-of-pocket expenses: Pay similar rates for similar care (“In Fight Over Medicare Payments, the Hospital Lobby Shows Its Strength,” Feb. 13).

As a neighborhood oncologist, it is clear to me how Medicare prefers medical facilities by paying more for services offered in medical facility outpatient departments (HOPDs) than the very same care provided in community-based centers. Last year, Medicare paid over 2.5 times as much in an HOPD as in a free-standing workplace for drug administration services. It’s not simply Medicare paying excessive; clients likewise deal with greater out-of-pocket expenses for care supplied in HOPDs. If the Lower Costs, More Transparency Act is signed into law, cancer clients would right away pay less for treatments like chemotherapy.

One unexpected effect of present payment variations is debt consolidation. To take advantage of greater repayments, health systems scoop up independent practices– a growing issue that is especially noticable in oncology. From 2008 to 2020435 neighborhood cancer centers closed, while 722 contracted with or were gotten by medical facilities. This debt consolidation is minimizing client gain access to, especially in backwoods, where numerous independent centers run little satellite websites that tend to be the very first to close when health centers obtain a community-based practice.

It’s time for Congress to end up the task through costs like the Lower Costs, More Transparency Act and the Website Actwhich would assist level the playing field at last.

— Scott Rushing, Vancouver, Washington


The chief marketing officer of SKYGEN cut to the chase on X.

— Donald H. Polite, Milwaukee


The ‘Gold Card’ Shuffle

Prior permission, by meaning, produces hold-ups in care and governmental barriers for doctors– which is why it is so unpleasant that lots of insurance companies now need previous permission for big classifications of treatments without any proof of overuse or unsuitable usage. With health insurance providers significantly executing doubtful previous permission policies, state and federal legislators are racing to put up safeguards that guarantee clients’ access to prompt care (“States Target Health Insurers’ ‘Prior Authorization’ Red Tape,” Feb. 12).

Much of the legislation to resolve this growing issue centers around using “Gold Cards” that exempt suppliers whose previous ask for previous permission have actually been authorized for a specific duration. In basic, these laws are essential for clients who can’t pay for to wait on care– specifically in the field of gastroenterology where extreme stomach discomfort or blood in the stool might suggest a severe condition like cancer.

Some insurance coverage business are co-opting the “Gold Card” term to validate brand-new previous permission requirements rather of improving existing ones. Think about the case of UnitedHealthcare, which revealed it would present a “Gold Card” prior permission program this year for a lot of colonoscopies and endoscopies. No other insurance provider has actually imposed such a policy, nor does the research study recommend there is an overutilization of these important services. Regardless of almost a year of great faith efforts to look for openness and assistance from UHC, the business has actually stopped working to launch any information or validation that these services are poorly used.

Diagnostic and security colonoscopies and endoscopies might be underutilized. New research study from the American Cancer Society reveals a disconcerting spike in the variety of more youthful Americans being detected with and passing away from colorectal cancer. Because signs of colorectal cancer do not frequently appear up until the illness is at an advanced phase, early detection is essential. Any interruption to monitoring colonoscopies (which follow elimination of a precancerous polyp and belong to the screening continuum) brought on by UHC’s upcoming previous permission policy would threaten for the business’s 27 million industrial recipients.

The American Gastroenterological Association highly advises UHC to rescind its “Gold Card” prior permission policy. Policymakers need to keep an eye on how insurance companies are co-opting ideas suggested to safeguard clients, in specific UHC’s synthetic “Gold Card,” which threatens client access to a treatment shown to conserve lives.

— Barbara Jung, president of the American Gastroenterological Association, Seattle


In an X post, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute explained the worth in needing previous permission.

Case-by-case previous permission is never ever enjoyable, however undoubtedly more suitable to most other approaches of getting rid of needless costs (ex post rejections of compensation, greater cost-sharing, topped international spending plans, and so on.) https://t.co/nYijeiAUtP

— Chris Pope (@CPopeHC) February 12, 2024

— Chris Pope, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, New York City


Hospice in Prison: A Transformative View

I was so satisfied with Markian Hawryluk’s remarkably well-written short article”Death and Redemption in an American Prison(Feb. 21). I was fortunate to work as an inaugural member of the American Hospital Association’s Circle of Life Award committee, from 1999 to 2004. The awards were developed to acknowledge the most exceptional hospice and palliative care programs in the U.S. The extremely first year, we got an application from the nation’s biggest maximum-security jail in Angola, Louisiana, the topic of Mr. Hawryluk’s fantastic post. The jail was among the 5 finalists selected for a website go to in 2000. I offered to be on group to check out and assess the jail’s hospice services.

Twenty-four years later on, I still remember my discussion with among the prisoner volunteers who had actually simply returned from bathing and feeding a passing away detainee. He informed me the prisoner stated, “I like you.” The prisoner volunteer mentioned, “I never ever heard those words in the past– not from my daddy, who I never ever fulfilled, nor from my mom.” In 2000, if one were sentenced to life at the Louisiana State Penitentiary, there was no possibility for parole. When we consulted with the warden, he pointed out there was a waiting list of detainees who wished to be hospice volunteers.

Please communicate my deep gratitude to Mr. Hawryluk for his impressive post.

— Paul Hofmann, president of the Hofmann Healthcare Group, Moraga, California


A digital writer shared the post on X.

Your one, long check out for today– it’s perfectly and attentively composed and reported

“Sometimes when you’re in a dark location, you learn who you actually are and what you want you might be,” Steven Garner stated. “Even in darkness, I might be a light.”https://t.co/57asjh11ZV

— Ameera B. ا ميرة بت (@meerabee) February 19, 2024

— Ameera Butt, Los Angeles


Feeling Insecure Because of Social Security Tactics

When will you continue your series on the overpayments to the Social Security Administration (“Overpayment Outrage)? Individuals are still suffering without advantages since the firm states individuals were paid too much and desires the cash back. Why is no one else asking more concerns?

Individuals in this nation strove and paid taxes. And when it is time to retire, the Social Security Administration declines to pay if, suddenly, it finds you have actually been paid too much. They have actually informed me I owe them $30,000 from over 20 years earlier, and I do not understand what they are discussing, however they wish to take my retirement cash up until it’s settled. Or they desire you to state it is okay to take a portion out. Doing that would state you’re guilty and you owe the cash– to me, that’s blackmail.

New immigrants secure free phones, treatment, debit cards, food help, education … that concerns more than my little quantity of retirement cash. It appears the federal government can pay for to look after them, however not their own. Everybody who has actually had their Social Security removed need to be entitled to the complimentary services they get, as we remain in the very same position– now we have absolutely nothing either.

— Thomas Troy, New York City


Long-lasting Minnesotan and epidemiologist Eric Weinhandl chimed in on X.

— Eric Weinhandl, Victoria, Minnesota


A Balanced View of the Law Curbing Surprise Bills

KFF Health News’ Elisabeth Rosenthal has actually long promoted for quality, patient-centric treatment. Her current short article,”The No Surprises Act Comes with Some Surprises(Feb. 14), falls brief in its analysis of surprise medical billing and the federal No Surprises Act (NSA). While she positions blame on doctors, the truth is more complex.

Clients with medical insurance ought to not be strained with paying more than their typical in-network cost-sharing quantity for unanticipated out-of-network care. This is not questionable. The legal argument was never ever about whether to act upon surprise billing, however rather how to act. While insurance companies preferred policies that would enable them to compute the payment rate medical suppliers get, with the NSA, Congress rather picked a method planned to safeguard sustainable payment rates that would maintain clients’ access to care. The NSA eliminates clients from payment conflicts in between insurance providers and companies and is meant to motivate settlements in between insurance companies and companies, with a choice for neutral arbitration.

Rosenthal’s short article indicates a “greedy medical professional” story, leaving out conversation of insurance companies as adding to the issues with the NSA’s execution. While the short article keeps in mind that lots of ask for arbitration originated from personal equity-associated service provider companies, it ignored to keep in mind that a single insurer (UnitedHealthcare) was associated with practically 40% of arbitration conflicts. That is more than the remainder of the leading 5 insurance coverage companies integrated. The short article likewise estimates and referrals documents by Zack Cooper, whose concealed connections with UnitedHealthcare emerged through lawsuits. As reportedUnitedHealthcare not just offered information to Cooper, however assisted frame the story of the work.

NSA rulemaking has actually economically incentivized insurance providers to utilize the NSA to unilaterally minimize existing contracted rates and push doctors out-of-network. When it comes to the predicted variety of ask for arbitration in 2022 (which undervalued “suppliers’ ire by an order of magnitude”), that forecast neglected existing information. In simply the very first 6 months of 2021, Texas alone had more than two times as numerous arbitration submissions for its state law as the federal government predicted for the country for a complete year. The short article overlooks the problem of why physicians demand arbitration. Considering that arbitration is baseball-style and “loser pays,” there is a strong disincentive to request it without a strong factor. In the 2nd quarter of 2023, service providers won almost 80% of disagreements, showing the reality that physicians are going to arbitration when insurance providers’ actions are unreasonable.

Even more, while it holds true that before the NSA a lot of clients were getting expenses for unforeseen out-of-network care, a report from the Department of Health and Human Services kept in mind that out-of-network billing was in fact decreasing prior to the NSA. Doctor study information recommends that post-NSA out-of-network care is now increasing due to some insurance providers’ actions.

The bipartisan NSA is a well balanced option to a complex issue. Troubles with the law’s application, consisting of the volume of disagreement submissions and stockpile of cases, are because of unintentional repercussions from rulemaking. Attending to these obstacles needs a sincere discussion about their cause. Moving forward, rulemaking is required to promote reasonable network contracting, restrict the requirement for arbitration, and, most significantly, secure clients’ access to care.

— Rich Heller, a pediatric radiologist and the associate primary medical officer for health policy, Radiology Partners, Chicago


Anesthetist-emergency physician-family medical professional David Moniz, in an X post, alerted of the “hidden repercussions” of the No Surprises Act.

Have a look at the unexpected results of the No Surprises Act, created to secure clients from unanticipated medical expenses. While it’s effectively protected lots of clients, there are hidden effects. Check out the complete short article here: https://t.co/YFa0xweRe7#health #healthpolicy #he

— David Moniz (@DavidMoniz15) February 14, 2024

— David Moniz, Chilliwack, British Columbia

Learn more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *