Ram Mandir: A timeline of Ayodhya land dispute leading up to inauguration

Ram Mandir: A timeline of Ayodhya land dispute leading up to inauguration

Nearly 7 years after the very first lawsuit was submitted over the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid conflict in post-independence India, in 2019, the nation’s Supreme Court provided a landmark decision leading the way for the building of Ram Mandir.

With the Ram Mandir consecration event in the Indian city of Ayodhya is simply a couple of days away, let’s have a look at the considerable occasions leading up to the minute that millions throughout the nation, if not the world, have actually been anticipating for several years now.

ENJOY| Secret Oppn leaders have chosen to avoid Jan 22 consecration, however what are they doing on the day?

1528: Babri Masjid was developed by Mir Baqi, leader of Mughal emperor Babur.

1885: Mahant Raghubir Das submits a plea in Faizabad district court looking for consent to construct a canopy outside the challenged Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid structure. The court declines the plea.

1949: Idols of Ram Lalla positioned under a main dome outside the challenged structure.

1950: Gopal Simla Visharad submits match in Faizabad district court for rights to praise the idols of Ram Lalla.

1959: Nirmohi Akhara submits fit looking for belongings of the website.

1961: A petitioner submitted a fit advocating the repair of the residential or commercial property to Muslims.

1981: UP Sunni Central Waqf Board submits match for belongings of the website.

February 1, 1986: Regional court orders the federal government to open the website for Hindu worshippers.

August 14, 1989: Allahabad High Court purchased upkeep of status quo in regard of the challenged structure.

December 6, 1992: Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid structure destroyed.

April 3, 1993: ‘Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act’ passed for acquisition of land by Centre in the disputed location.

1993: Different writ petitions, consisting of one by Ismail Faruqui, submitted at Allahabad High Court challenging numerous elements of the Act.

October 24, 1994: Supreme Court states in the historical Ismail Faruqui case that a mosque was not essential to Islam.

April 2002: High Court starts hearing on identifying who owns the disputed website.

March 13, 2003: Supreme Court states, in the Aslam alias Bhure case, no spiritual activity of any nature is permitted at the obtained land.

March 14, 2003: Supreme Court states interim order passed ought to be personnel till disposal of the civil matches in Allahabad High Court to keep common consistency.

September 30, 2010: High Court, in a 2:1 bulk, guidelines department of the disputed location in between Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

May 9, 2011: Supreme Court remains High Court decision on Ayodhya land conflict.

February 26, 2016: Subramanian Swamy submits plea in Supreme Court looking for building of Ram Temple at the disputed website

March 21, 2017: Chief Justice of India JS Khehar recommends an out-of-court settlement amongst competing celebrations.

August 7, 2017: The Supreme Court makes up a three-judge bench to hear pleas challenging the 1994 decision of the Allahabad High Court.

August 8, 2017: UP Shia Central Waqf Board informs Supreme Court mosque might be integrated in a Muslim-dominated location at an affordable range from the disputed website.

September 11, 2017: Supreme Court directs Chief Justice of the Allahabad HC to choose 2 extra district judges within 10 days as observers to handle the maintenance of the disputed website.

November 20, 2017: UP Shia Central Waqf Board informs Supreme Court temple can be integrated in Ayodhya and mosque in Lucknow.

December 1, 2017:32 civil liberties activists submit plea challenging the 2010 decision of the Allahabad High Court.

February 8, 2018: Supreme Court begins hearing the civil appeals.

March 14, 2018: Supreme Court declines all interim pleas, consisting of Swamy’s, looking for to step in as celebrations in the event.

April 6, 2018: Rajeev Dhavan submits plea in Supreme Court to refer the problem of reconsideration of the observations in its 1994 judgement to a bigger bench.

July 6, 2018: UP federal government informs the Supreme Court some Muslim groups were attempting to postpone the hearing by looking for reconsideration of observation in the 1994 decision.

July 20, 2018: Supreme Court reserves decision.

September 27, 2018: Supreme Court decreases to refer the case to a five-judge Constitution bench.

January 2019: SC established a five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi to hear the case.

April 2019: Nirmohi Akhara opposes Centre’s plea to return obtained land around Ayodhya website to owners.

November 9, 2019: Supreme Court provides landmark decision, ending the practically 70-year conflict, and buying that the contested 2.77 acres of land be moved to a trust, to be established by the Indian federal government, for the building of Ram Temple. The peak court likewise bought assigning 5 acres to Muslims in Ayodhya for developing a mosque.

August 5, 2020: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi laid the structure stone for the building and construction of the Ram Mandir

January 22, 2024: Pran Pratishtha (consecration event) of Ram Lalla’s idol set up to happen.

(With inputs from firms)

Find out more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *