Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro review

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro review

Complete throttle! Nubia’s RedMagic series is associated with no-compromise efficiency, appealing style and beneficial video gaming functions. The RedMagic 9 Pro similarly remains real to this viewpoint and when again includes an integrated fan on board. Read our evaluation to learn whether it deserves an upgrade.

Daniel Schmidt Daniel Schmidt (equated by Zhiwei Zhuang), Released

Show

6.80 inch 20:9, 2480 x 1116 pixel 400 PPI, Capacitive, BOE Q9+, AMOLED, 2160 Hz PWM dimming, Corning Gorilla Glass, shiny: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB

487.39 GB totally free

Links

1 USB 3.0/ 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Audio jack (3.5 mm), USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, distance, compass, 520Hz touch tasting rate touchpads, OTG, Game Space Switch: Toggles unique video game mode on or off

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/ n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band C0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28A, 28B, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.98 x 76.35 (= 0.35 x 6.46 x 3.01 in)

Battery

6500 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

quickly charging/ Quickcharge

Running System

Android 14

Cam

Main Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung GN5, 1/1.57″, OIS) 50 MPix (Ultra Wide, Samsung JN1, f/2.2, 0.64 µm) 2 MPix (f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0)

Extra functions

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: On-screen, 80W battery charger, clear case, USB Cable, SIM ejector tool, RedMagic OS 9.0, 12 Months Warranty, RGB light: totally customisable lighting impacts; 20,000 RPM high-speed turbofan; DRM Widevine L1; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a); HDR: HLG, HDR10; DRM Widevine L1, fanless

Weight

229 g (= 8.08 oz/ 0.5 pounds), Power Supply: 125 g (= 4.41 oz/ 0.28 pounds)

Keep in mind: The producer might utilize parts from various providers consisting of screen panels, drives or memory sticks to comparable requirements.

Bewertung

Information

Modell

Gewicht

Laufwerk

Groesse

Aufloesung

Preis ab

86.8 %

02/2024

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
229 g 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.80″ 2480×1116
88.3 %

08/2023

Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
228 g 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.80″ 2480×1116
87.4 %

01/2024

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.67″ 3200×1440
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
225 g 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.78″ 2400×1080

The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro is extremely angular and recollects the style of its predecessor. The gadget is well balanced and sits well in the hand in spite of being relatively heavy. It is offered in the colourways Sleet (black), Cyclone (clear back) and Snowfall (silver-white).

We like the 9 Pro’s constructed quality: all the spaces on the phone are little and even. It as soon as again has a smooth display screen with the front video camera concealed underneath the panel. The under-display electronic camera is on the other hand essentially unnoticeable and can just be found when you see it from specific angles with great deals of light shining on the screen. The rear cams are flush with the phone’s body– something you do not see frequently nowadays. They are similarly covered by an undefined glass.

The video gaming phone does not have any IP accreditation, however the sealed SIM slot recommends that there is at least some fundamental defense versus sprinkling water.

The phone resembles its predecessor when it pertains to functions. On the ideal side of the phone, you’ll as soon as again discover 2 touch-sensitive devoted triggers. They offer excellent haptic feedback and feel extremely responsive throughout video gaming.

The incorporated USB port not just provides high information transfer speeds (copy test: 635.9 MB/s) however likewise supports video output by means of a cable television. This implies you can quickly mirror the screen or load up a desktop variation of RedMagic Game Space (approximately Full HD and 144Hz).

The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro supports all standard mobile interactions requirements with a large frequency protection. Wireless LAN connection is actually stylish and steady with Wi-Fi 7 in addition to in both the 5.0 GHz and 6.0 GHz variety.

The phone uses good voice quality as long as you hold it to your ear. That stated, sound suppression is typical at best, and the RedMagic sounds somewhat echoey in speaker mode.

For running system, the phone features Android 14 with Nubia’s RedMagic OS 9.0 customized UI. At the time of evaluation, the security spots were dated 1 November 2023 and hence no longer entirely as much as date. Based upon experience, updates are just presented sporadically. Nubia has actually simply guaranteed to supply one significant upgrade and 2 years of security spots.

Biometric security is managed by an in-display optical finger print scanner that does its task effectively and can determine heart rate to boot. Or in addition, you can utilize facial acknowledgment by means of the front electronic camera, however this technique is less safe.

Apart from the 2 additional capacitive shoulder sets off, there is a striking, red button developed into the frame that lets you change to an unique video gaming user interface on the phone: the RedMagic Game Space. It lets users personalize settings for specific video games and handle any paired devices.

095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 send AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1688 (829-1880)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transfer AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1734 (1577-1828)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 get AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (654-1703)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 get AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1482 (659-1568)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 get AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1657 (1500-1710)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 get AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø814 (767-825)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 send AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1801 (1553-1882)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 send AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (475-989)

Selfie taken with the RedMagic 9 Pro

Absolutely nothing much has actually altered with the front video camera. The under-display electronic camera has an appeal mode at its disposal, however images still look muddy and do not have information even when this function is handicapped. Images likewise rapidly end up being exceptionally loud in low-light conditions.

The primary video camera module now has one lens less than its predecessor. The wide-angle sensing unit corresponds the one on the RedMagic Eight Pro Now has optical image stabilisation (OIS). The 2nd lens has 50 MP too and can be utilized to take both ultra-wide and macro images. Whilst doing not have any optical zoom, the phone can as much as 10 times digital zoom. Pictures taken with the RedMagic 9 Pro have a good level of information however look rather washed-out and dull.

You can tape videos at approximately 8K (30 fps) with the primary shooter and Full HD (30 fps) with the front video camera.

Image Comparison

Pick a scene and browse within the very first image. One click modifications the position on touchscreens. One click the zoomed-in image opens the initial in a brand-new window. The very first image reveals the scaled photo of the test gadget.

Main electronic cameraMain video cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light

click to fill images

11.4 ∆ E

6 ∆ E

5.4 ∆ E

6.5 ∆ E

5.6 ∆ E

6.7 ∆ E

8.3 ∆ E

10.4 ∆ E

7.7 ∆ E

4.9 ∆ E

2.7 ∆ E

5.1 ∆ E

11.6 ∆ E

9.3 ∆ E

9 ∆ E

4.4 ∆ E

5 ∆ E

7.4 ∆ E

7.3 ∆ E

1.2 ∆ E

3.9 ∆ E

2.2 ∆ E

4 ∆ E

8 ∆ E

ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro: 6.42 ∆ E minutes: 1.2 – max: 11.56 ∆ E

27.7 ∆ E

46.9 ∆ E

35.5 ∆ E

33.4 ∆ E

39.3 ∆ E

54.3 ∆ E

45.8 ∆ E

29.8 ∆ E

33.5 ∆ E

26.2 ∆ E

56.2 ∆ E

56.2 ∆ E

26.5 ∆ E

43 ∆ E

29 ∆ E

64.3 ∆ E

35.5 ∆ E

38.8 ∆ E

68.9 ∆ E

64.5 ∆ E

48.5 ∆ E

35 ∆ E

22.8 ∆ E

12.9 ∆ E

ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro: 40.61 ∆ E minutes: 12.89 – max: 68.94 ∆ E
Subpixel structure

In regards to basic specifications, the display screen on the RedMagic 9 Pro stays the same from the previous generation: it’s a 6.8-inch Full HD+ panel efficient in as much as 120Hz revitalize rate. Colour precision and brightness have actually been even more enhanced.

With the ambient light sensing unit allowed, the AMOLED screen struck a typical peak brightness of 1,031 cd/m ² whilst revealing a totally white image. When intense and dark locations are dispersed uniformly (APL 18), the panel even handled to get as brilliant as 1,242 cd/m ². It likewise reached a comparable level for HDR playback. The display screen has a manual max brightness of 589 cd/m ².

Like all OLED panels, the screen on RedMagic 9 Pro isn’t spared from flickering either. That stated, Nubia utilizes high-frequency PWM dimming at 2,160 Hz to make the screen as comfy to the eye as possible.

1012
cd/m ²
1023
cd/m ²
1048
cd/m ²
1017
cd/m ²
1035
cd/m ²
1054
cd/m ²
1011
cd/m ²
1036
cd/m ²
1042
cd/m ²

Circulation of brightness

BOE Q9+ evaluated with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Optimum: 1054 cd/m ² (Nits) Average: 1030.9 cd/m ² Minimum: 3.32 cd/m ²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
On Battery: 1035 cd/m ²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m ²)
ΔE Color 1|0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6|0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
BOE Q9+, AMOLED, 2480×1116, 6.80
Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro
AMOLED, 2480×1116, 6.80
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
AMOLED, 3200×1440, 6.67
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
OLED, 2400×1080, 6.78
Action Times

-77%

20%

218%

Action Time Grey 50%/ Grey 80% *

0.8

Show Response Times

Show action times demonstrate how quick the screen has the ability to alter from one color to the next. Sluggish action times can cause afterimages and can trigger moving challenge appear fuzzy (ghosting). Players of hectic 3D titles ought to pay unique attention to quick reaction times.

Reaction Time Black to White
1.08 ms … increase ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.539 ms increase 19659338 ↘ 0.5365 ms fall 19659339 The screen reveals extremely quick action rates in our tests and must be extremely well fit for hectic video gaming. In contrast, all evaluated gadgets vary from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (optimum) ms.” 1 % of all gadgets are much better. This implies that the determined reaction time is much better than the average of all evaluated gadgets (21.7 ms). ↔ 19459008 Action Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey 0.8 ms 19459009 … increase ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.4015 ms increase 19659343 ↘ 0.401 ms fall The screen reveals extremely quick reaction rates in our tests and ought to be extremely well fit for hectic video gaming. 19459022 In contrast, all evaluated gadgets vary from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (optimum) ms.” 1 % of all gadgets are much better. 19459022 This suggests that the determined action time is much better than the average of all checked gadgets (34.2 ms). 19659345 Screen Flickering/ PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation) 19659346 ℹ To dim the screen, some note pads will merely cycle the backlight on and off in quick succession – a technique called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). This biking frequency must preferably be undetected to the human eye. If stated frequency is too low, users with delicate eyes might experience stress or headaches or perhaps discover the flickering completely. 19659348 Screen flickering/ PWM identified 19659349 60 Hz 19659350 The screen backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., making use of PWM). 19659351 The frequency of 60 Hz is really low, so the flickering might trigger eyestrain and headaches after extended usage. In contrast: 53 % of all evaluated gadgets do not utilize PWM to dim the screen. If PWM was discovered, approximately 18379 (minimum: 5 – optimum: 3846000) Hz was determined. 19659353 The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro is among the very first mobile phones offered internationally to include the 19459449 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Thanks to the integrated fan, which runs even quieter (max. 39 dB(A)) than the one in the 19459408 Eight Pro , the phone has the ability to keep the processor running stably at peak efficiency the majority of the time. In our internet browser criteria, we saw that the RedMagic phone and Chrome do not play especially well together. Outcomes were remarkably bad when Google’s internet browser was utilized. Things were various when we utilized Microsoft Edge. 19659355 We ran the Burnout standard (CPU + GPU) to mimic a heavy load. The RedMagic 9 Pro crashed after about 10 minutes and needed a reboot. The gadget overheated regardless of having a fan. Subsequent measurements were therefore performed with just CPU load made it possible for. However, the video gaming phone ended up being extremely hot. 19659356 The 2 speakers on the RedMagic 9 Pro can get truly loud, however they currently sound tinny and empty at moderate volume levels. 19659357 The Nubia phone genuinely shines when it concerns battery life. The battery has a tremendous 6,500 mAh capability and lasted an exceptional 17 hours in our Wi-Fi test. Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core Xiaomi 14 Pro 19659361 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 1687 Points 19659363 +7% 19659364 Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 1672 Points +6% Typical 19459009 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 19659369 (1575 – 1702, n=6) 19659371 1662 Points 19659372 +6% Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 19659374 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 1575 Points Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 1574 19459009 Points 19659379 0% 19659380 Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 19659381 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 19659382 1266 Points 19659383 -20% 19659384 Typical of class 19459009 Smart device 19659385 (119 – 2138, n=218, last 2 years) 19659387 905 19459009 Points -43% Multi-Core Xiaomi 14 Pro 19659391 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 6439 19459009 Points 19659393 +19% 19659394 Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 19659396 6415 Points +19% Typical Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 19659399 19659400 (5393 – 6543, n=6) 6209 Points +15% 19659403 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 19659405 5393 19459009 Points 19659406 Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro 19659407 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 19659408 5129 19459009 Points 19659409 -5% 19659410 Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 19659412 3965 Points 19659413 -26% 19659414 Typical of class 19459009 Smart device 19659416 (473 – 6681, n=218, last 2 years) 2932 19459009 Points 19659418 -46% 19659419 Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core 19659421 Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19659422 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 19659423 2318 Points 19659424 +2% Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 2258 19459009 Points 19659428 -1% Xiaomi 14 Pro 19659430 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 19659431 2278 19459009 Points 0% Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 19659434 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 2270 19459009 Points 19659436 Typical 19459009 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 19659437 (2127 – 2329, n=8) 2249 19459009 Points -1% Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro 19659442 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 2104 Points 19659444 -7% Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 1741 Points -23% 19659449 Typical of class Smart device (193 – 2930, n=79, last 2 years) 1455 19459009 Points -36% 19659454 Multi-Core 19659455 Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19659456 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 19659457 7357 19459009 Points 19659458 +3% Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19659460 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 19659461 7193 19459009 Points +1% 19659463 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 19659464 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 19659465 7151 19459009 Points Typical 19459009 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 19659468 (6765 – 7501, n=8) 7095 Points 19659470 -1% Xiaomi 14 Pro 19659472 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 6875 19459009 Points 19659474 -4% 19659475 Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 5648 Points 19659478 -21% 19659479 Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 19659480 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 19659481 4346 Points -39% 19659483 Typical of class 19459009 Mobile phone 19659484 19659485 (845 – 7408, n=79, last 2 years) 19659486 3976 Points -44% 19659488 PCMark for Android – Work 3.0 Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19659490 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 21385 Points 19659492 +2% 19659493 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 20943 19459009 Points 19659496 Typical 19459009 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (15876 – 21628, n=6) 19659499 19316 19459009 Points 19659500 -8% 19659501 Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 19659503 17399 Points 19659504 -17% Xiaomi 14 Pro 19659506 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 19659507 15876 19459009 Points 19659508 -24% Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 15774 Points -25% 19659513 Typical of class 19459009 Smart device 19659514 19659515 (4761 – 21385, n=211, last 2 years) 11535 19459009 Points -45% 19659518 Antutu v10 – Total Score Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 2162423 19459009 Points 19659522 0% 19659523 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 19659524 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 19659525 2157865 Points 19659526 Typical 19459009 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 19659527 (1905751 – 2162423, n=6) 19659529 2074885 19459009 Points 19659530 -4% Xiaomi 14 Pro 19659532 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 19659533 1905751 19459009 Points 19659534 -12% 19659535 Typical of class Smart device 19659537 (461567 – 2162423, n=31, last 2 years) 19659538 1326858 19459009 Points 19659539 -39% Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 19659541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 19659542 1308217 19459009 Points 19659543 -39% 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited Score Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19659547 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 19690 19459009 Points +1% Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 19659551 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 19566 Points 19659553 Typical 19459009 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 19659554 (19319 – 19690, n=4) 19659556 19554 19459009 Points 0% 19659558 Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro 19659559 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 19659560 14737 19459009 Points -25% Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 19659563 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 19659564 8294 19459009 Points 19659565 -58% 19659566 Typical of class Smart device 19659567 19659568 (392 – 20068, n=200, last 2 years) 5970 19459009 Points 19659570 -69% 19659571 Wild Life Extreme 19659572 Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 19659574 5226 19459009 Points 19659575 +2% 19659576 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 19659578 5143 Points 19659579 Typical Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4744 – 5338, n=5) 5132 19459009 Points 19659583 0% 19659584 Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro 19659585 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 19659586 3935 Points -23% 19659588 Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 19659589 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 19659590 2121 Points -59% 19659592 Typical of class Smart device 19659593 (22 – 5226, n=205, last 2 years) 19659595 1599 Points -69% Wild Life Extreme Unlimited Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19659599 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 19659600 5185 19459009 Points +1% 19659602 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 5150 19459009 Points 19659605 Typical 19459009 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4729 – 5185, n=4) 5060 19459009 Points 19659609 -2% Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 19659612 3900 Points 19659613 -24% 19659614 Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 19659616 2079 19459009 Points -60% 19659618 Typical of class 19459009 Smart device 19659619 (109 – 5248, n=198, last 2 years) 1610 19459009 Points -69% 19659623 Solar Bay Score Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 19659625 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 19659626 8648 19459009 Points 19659627 Typical Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 19659628 (8547 – 8720, n=3) 8638 19459009 Points 0% 19659632 Typical of class Mobile phone (3332 – 8720, n=19, last 2 years) 19659635 5777 Points -33% Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 19659639 5700 Points 19659640 -34% Solar Bay Unlimited Score 19659642 Typical Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 19659643 19659644 (8668 – 8758, n=2) 8713 Points 19659646 +1% 19659647 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 8668 19459009 Points Typical of class Mobile phone 19659651 (3229 – 8758, n=19, last 2 years) 19659653 5707 Points 19659654 -34% 19659655 Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro 19659656 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 5669 Points 19659658 -35% 19659659 GFXBench on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 19659663 109 19459009 fps 19659664 +82% 19659665 Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 101 19459009 fps +68% Typical 19459009 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (60 – 121, n=6) 19659672 88.5 fps +48% Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19659675 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 19659676 61 fps +2% Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 19659680 60 19459009 fps 0% 19659682 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 60 fps Typical of class Smart device 19659686 (3.6 – 123, n=225, last 2 years) 19659688 43.4 fps 19659689 -28% 19659690 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Xiaomi 14 Pro 19659692 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 209 19459009 fps +29% Typical 19459009 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 19659696 19659697 (162 – 241, n=7) 208 19459009 fps +28% 19659700 Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19659701 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 19659702 183 19459009 fps +13% 19659704 Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro 19659705 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 19659706 165 fps +2% Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 19659709 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 19659710 162 19459009 fps Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 19659713 126 19459009 fps 19659714 -22% 19659715 Typical of class 19459009 Smart device 19659716 19659717 (2.3 – 229, n=225, last 2 years) 19659718 62 fps -62% on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen 19659721 Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 76 19459009 fps +27% Typical 19459009 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (60 – 93, n=6) 19659728 73.7 fps +23% Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 19659731 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 63 fps +5% 19659734 Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19659735 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 19659736 61 fps +2% 19659738 Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 60 fps 0% Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 19659744 60 fps 19659745 Typical of class Smart device 19659746 (2.8 – 100, n=225, last 2 years) 19659748 32.1 fps -46% 2560×1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen Xiaomi 14 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 85 fps +33% 19659755 Typical Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 19659756 (64 – 96, n=8) 19659758 83 19459009 fps 19659759 +30% Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro 19659761 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 72 fps +13% Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19659765 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 19659766 68 19459009 fps +6% Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 19659769 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 19659770 64 19459009 fps 19659771 Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 19659772 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 48 fps -25% 19659775 Typical of class 19459009 Mobile phone 19659776 (0.85 – 94, n= 225, last 2 years) 24.7 19459009 fps -61% 3840×2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen Typical Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 19659783 (37 – 42, n= 6) 19659784 39.3 fps +3% Xiaomi 14 Pro 19659787 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 (vulkan 1.0) 39 fps 19659790 +3% 19659791 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 38 fps 19659794 Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19659795 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 19659796 37 19459009 fps -3% Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro 19659799 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 19659800 33 fps 19659801 -13% 19659802 Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 19659803 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 19659804 22 19459009 fps -42% 19659806 Typical of class Smart device (0.38 – 42, n= 190, last 2 years) 19659809 12.2 19459009 fps -68% 19659811 Octane V2 – Total Score 19659812 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 (Edge 120) 70135 19459009 Points 19659816 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384 19659818 (Chrome 120) 19659819 25953 19459009 Points -63% Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19659822 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 24576 (Edge 121.0.2277.84) 63669 Points -9% Typical Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 – 70135, n= 6) 19659829 58482 Points -17% 19659831 Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288 (Chrome 120.0.6099.115) 55611 Points 19659835 -21% Xiaomi 14 Pro 19659837 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288 19659838 (Chrome 120) 54365 Points 19659840 -22% 19659841 Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Edge 115) 19659844 52492 Points -25% 19659846 Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro 19659847 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384 (Chrome 115) 19659849 19870 19459009 Points -72% 19659851 Typical of class Mobile phone 19659852 (4633 – 89112, n= 202, last 2 years) 33542 Points 19659855 -52% 19659856 0 19659857 10 19659858 20 19659859 30 40 19659861 50 19659862 60 19659863 70 19659864 80 90 19659866 100 110 19659868 120 130 19659870 Tooltip 19659871 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro ; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560×1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø58.9 (15.2-100.4) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 19459011; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: 19459008 Ø71.5 (17.9-136.2) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 19459011; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560×1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: 19459008 Ø13.9 (9.4-22) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 19459011; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø16.9 (10.9-48.7) 19659875 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Nubia RedMagic 8S Pro Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19659879 Typical 19459009 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 19659880 Typical of class 19459009 Mobile phone AndroBench 3-5 -19% -42% 19659884 -3% 19659885 -12% 19659886 -61% 19659887 Consecutive Read 256KB 4164.08 19659889 3576.35 19659890 -14% 19659891 1876.8 19659892 -55% 19659893 4016.67 19659894 -4% 3689 el.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’); ); return incorrect; 19460067 (3344 – 4512, n= 12) -11% 19659898 1394 ); return incorrect; 19460067 (215 – 4512, n= 212, last 2 years) -67% 19659901 Consecutive Write 256KB 3199.98 19659903 2682.03 -16% 1773.94 -45% 3153.4 -1% 19659909 2940 19459429 ); return incorrect; 19460067 (1891 – 3518, n= 12) -8% 19659912 1005 ); return incorrect; 19460067 (57.5 – 3518, n= 212, last 2 years) 19659914 -69% Random Read 4KB 442.82 19659917 369.76 -16% 342.04 -23% 434.63 -2% 419 19459429 el.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’); ); return incorrect; 19460067 19659924 (268 – 480, n= 12) 19659925 -5% 237 19459429 el.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’); ); return incorrect; 19460067 (22.2 – 543, n= 212, last 2 years) -46% 19659929 Random Write 4KB 691.17 479.52 -31% 372.35 -46% 19659935 648 -6% 19659937 515 el.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’); ); return incorrect; (174.3 – 701, n= 12) 19659939 -25% 255 19459429 ); return incorrect; (13 – 701, n= 213, last 2 years) 19659942 -63% 19659943 54.7 ° C 130 F 19659945 54.2 ° C 130 F 51.1 ° C 19459022 124 F 19659949 55 ° C 131 F 55.1 ° C 19459022 131 F 52.2 ° C 19459022 126 F 19659952 19659954 54.7 ° C 130 F 53.9 ° C 19459022 129 F 53.3 ° C 19459022 128 F Optimum: 55.1 ° C = 131 F 19459022 Typical: 53.8 ° C = 129 F 19659959 45 ° C 113 F 19659960 50 ° C 122 F 49.1 ° C 120 F 19659962 47.7 ° C 19459022 118 F 48.5 ° C 119 F 41.6 ° C 19459022 107 F 19659965 48.3 ° C 119 F 19659966 50.4 ° C 19459022 123 F 19659967 51.6 ° C 19459022 125 F Optimum: 51.6 ° C = 125 F Typical: 48 ° C = 118 F 19659969 Power Supply (max.) 26.9 ° C = 80 F|Space Temperature 22 ° C = 72 F|Fluke t3000FC (adjusted) & & Voltcraft IR-260 19659970 (-) The typical temperature level for the upper side under optimum load is 53.8 ° C/ 129 F, compared to the average of 32.7 ° C/ 91 F for the gadgets in the class Smartphone. 19659971 (-) 19459009 The optimum temperature level on the upper side is 55.1 ° C/ 131 F, compared to the average of 35 ° C/ 95 F, varying from 21.9 to 56 ° C for the class Smartphone. 19659972 (-) 19459009 The bottom warms up to an optimum of 51.6 ° C/ 125 F, compared to the average of 33.8 ° C/ 93 F (+) 19459009 In idle use, the typical temperature level for the upper side is 24.5 ° C/ 76 F, compared to the gadget average of 32.7 ° C/ 91 F. 19659974 0 10 19659976 20 30 40 19659979 50 19659980 60 70 19659982 80 90 100 19659985 110 Tooltip 19659987 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø30.2 (29.2-31) Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: 19459008 Ø29.5 (28.4-31.3) Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: 19459008 Ø26.9 (24.5-31) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: 19459008 Ø109.7 (102.5-112.2) Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø105.8 (103.3-111.5) 19659992 Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø96.1 (86.1-111.7) 19659993 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 19459011 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: 19459008 Ø117.1 (117-117.1) Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø28.8 (28.8-28.9) 19659995 Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø27 (24.8-28.8) 19659996 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø29.2 (29.1-29.2) dB( A) 19659998 0 19659999 10 20 30 40 19660003 50 60 19660005 70 19660006 80 19660007 90 19660008 Deep Bass Middle Bass High Bass Lower Range Mids 19660013 Greater Mids Lower Highs Mid Highs 19660016 Upper Highs Super Highs 20 37.6 38.4 19660021 25 19660022 24.7 19660023 39.8 19660024 31 19660025 24 19660026 40.1 19660027 40 24.6 41.4 50 32.1 19660032 43.2 19660033 63 22 42.8 80 19660037 16.4 19660038 41.3 19660039 100 19660040 26 19660041 44.7 125 19660043 19.8 19660044 46.2 19660045 160 19660046 15.6 19660047 51.3 19660048 200 19660049 14.6 55.8 19660051 250 11.1 19660053 59.5 19660054 315 19660055 8.2 19660056 60.3 400 11.5 19660059 65.6 19660060 500 9.9 19660062 75.3 630 19660064 8.4 19660065 77.5 19660066 800 10.2 78.3 19660069 1000 19660070 11 19660071 80.1 1250 13.4 19660074 78.8 19660075 1600 19660076 12.1 77.5 2000 19660079 12 81.5 2500 12.3 19660083 83.1 19660084 3150 12.4 83.9 4000 19660088 13 81.5 19660090 5000 19660091 13.1 19660092 77 6300 19660094 13.8 19660095 74.6 19660096 8000 19660097 13.7 71.1 19660099 10000 14 70.7 12500 13.7 19660104 65.5 19660105 16000 12.8 19660107 53.4 19660108 SPL 19660109 24.7 91.7 19660111 N 0.6 89.1 mean 12.8 19660115 mean 75.3 19660116 Delta 1.5 19660118 10.5 19660119 28.6 36.1 25.9 34.5 19660123 23.4 19660124 35.6 27.3 35.9 36.2 38.7 19660129 25.4 19660130 40 16.6 19660132 44.2 16.9 46.6 19660135 14.7 47.2 19660137 13.1 19660138 52.3 15.1 19660140 54.7 19660141 14.3 57.3 19660143 11.6 19660144 61.9 10 19660146 61.1 19660147 9.1 67.6 11.1 68.7 19660151 9.1 19660152 73.1 19660153 11.8 75.8 19660155 15 19660156 76.9 11.3 19660158 77.5 19660159 12 81.2 19660161 12.3 83.2 12.7 19660164 84.9 19660165 12.6 19660166 83.8 19660167 13.1 79.7 13.4 78 13.5 19660172 77.1 13.5 74.5 19660175 13.6 63.7 19660177 13.6 19660178 57.3 19660179 24.7 19660180 92.2 0.6 19660182 87.8 average 13.1 19460000 19460001 average 74.5 19459056 19460002 19460003 1.3 19460004 19460005 9.9 19459056 19460007 hearing variety conceal average 19460009 Pink Noise 19460010 ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. toggle_1001782_0’). forEach( aspect => element.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’) );”/ > 19460011 element.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’) ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. toggle_1001782_0’). forEach( component => element.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’) ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. pn_1001782_1’). forEach( component => element.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’) ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. toggle_1001782_1’). forEach( component => ); Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 19459056 19460012 ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. toggle_1001782_0’). forEach( component => element.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’) );”/ > ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. toggle_1001782_1’). forEach( aspect => );”/ > 19460014 element.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’) ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. toggle_1001782_1’). forEach( aspect => );”/ > element.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’) ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. toggle_1005989_0’). forEach( aspect => element.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’) );”/ > ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. toggle_1005989_0’). forEach( aspect => element.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’) ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. pn_1005989_1’). forEach( component => element.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’) ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. toggle_1005989_1’). forEach( aspect => element.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’) ); Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 19460017 element.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’) ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. toggle_1005989_0’). forEach( component => );”/ > ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. toggle_1005989_1’). forEach( component => );”/ > 19460019 ); document.querySelectorAll(‘. toggle_1005989_1’). forEach( component => element.classList.toggle(‘ hideEl’) );”/ > 19660184 Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be examined and unattended to compare gadgets) 19660185 Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro audio analysis 19460021 (+) 19459009|speakers can play reasonably loud (91.7 dB) Bass 100 – 315 Hz (-) |almost no bass – usually 22.3% lower than typical 19660189 (+) 19459009|bass is direct (5.1% delta to prev. frequency) Mids 400 – 2000 Hz 19660191 (+) |well balanced mids – just 4% far from typical 19660192 (+) 19459009|mids are direct (5.3% delta to prev. frequency) 19660193 Highs 2 – 16 kHz 19660194 (+) |well balanced highs – just 4.8% far from typical (+) |highs are direct (3.5% delta to prev. frequency) Total 100 – 16.000 Hz ( ± )|linearity of general noise is typical (16.7% distinction to average) 19660198 Compared to exact same class 5% of all checked gadgets in this class were much better, 4% comparable, 90% even worse 19660200 The very best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134% 19660201 Compared to all gadgets checked 19459005 23% of all checked gadgets were much better, 7% comparable, 70% even worse 19660203 The very best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134% 19460020 Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro audio analysis 19460021 (+) |speakers can play fairly loud (92.2 dB) Bass 100 – 315 Hz 19660207 (-) 19459009|almost no bass – usually 21.2% lower than mean 19660208 (+) 19459009|bass is direct (4.8% delta to prev. frequency) 19660209 Mids 400 – 2000 Hz ( ± )|decreased mids – usually 5.1% lower than mean (+) |mids are direct (4.2% delta to prev. frequency) 19660212 Highs 2 – 16 kHz ( ± ) 19459009|greater highs – usually 5.6% greater than average 19660214 (+) 19459009|highs are direct (3.3% delta to prev. frequency) General 100 – 16.000 Hz 19660216 ( ±) |linearity of general noise is typical (17.3% distinction to mean) Compared to very same class 19660218 19459005 7% of all evaluated gadgets in this class were much better, 6% comparable, 87% even worse 19459005 The very best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134% 19660220 Compared to all gadgets evaluated 19660221 26% of all evaluated gadgets were much better, 8% comparable, 66% even worse 19660222 The very best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134% 19460022 Battery Runtime 19660225 WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 120) 17h 16min 19460023 Pros 19660229 + brilliant, precise and quick screen + high efficiency + extra touch sensing units 19660235 + 19660236 long battery life Cons 19660238 – 19660239 can get really hot 19660240 – 19660241 brief upgrade assistance duration – 19660243 no IP accreditation – 19660245 no cordless charging 19460024 19460064 Evaluation: Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro. The evaluation system is kindly supplied by Nubia. (Photo: Daniel Schmidt) Evaluation: Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro. The evaluation system is kindly supplied by Nubia. 19660249 The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro is a small advance from its predecessor, the Eight Pro 19459011 Familiar highlights such as configurable LEDs and additional shoulder buttons are when again on board and basically the same. Having the newest Qualcomm SoC, the video gaming phone likewise provides a brighter display screen, a quieter fan and a bigger battery. The brand-new cam setup has actually been enhanced. The phone can now charge at up to 80 watts. 19460026 19459003 The RedMagic 9 Pro is an effective video gaming phone with a little price. It can get extremely hot. 19460027 It’s good that the fan now runs quieter, the cooling service wasn’t enough to keep the phone from shutting down throughout our tension test. Nubia would succeed to throttle the SoC a little instead of choosing full-blown efficiency. Whilst getting too hot isn’t a concern when video gaming, surface area temperature levels can run high.

A handful of functions are likewise missing out on, such as cordless charging and IP accreditation, both of which can be neglected offered the item’s focus. A gadget in this cost variety must have eSIM assistance.

The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is the RedMagic 9 Pro’s most difficult rival. If you mainly appreciate efficiency, other high-end smart devices might similarly be excellent options for you, not least the Nubia Z60 Ultra.

The Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro is readily available in 3 setups:

Colour RAM/Storage Cost (RRP)
Sleet 12/256 GB EUR649/US$649
Cyclone 16/512 GB EUR799/US$799
Snowfall 16/512 GB EUR799/US$799

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro

– 02/05/2024v7
Daniel Schmidt

Application Performance

96 / 90100%

Mobile phone – Weighted Average

Openness

Today evaluation sample was provided to the author as a loan by the maker or a look for the functions of evaluation. The lending institution had no impact on this evaluation, nor did the producer get a copy of this evaluation before publication. There was no commitment to release this evaluation.

Pricecompare

Daniel Schmidt, 2024-02- 6 (Update: 2024-02- 6)

Learn more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *