1024″ height=”682″ src=”https://www.pcworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Kingston-NV2-hero.jpg?quality=50&strip=all&w=1024″ alt=”Kingston NV2 NVMe SSD” decoding=”async” data-hero >
Image: Jon L. Jacobi
At a glimpse
Specialist’s Rating
Pros
- Remarkably inexpensive
- Excellent real-world efficiency
Cons
- Brief three-year service warranty with low TBW ranking
- 150MBps crossing out cache
Our Verdict
If you’re on the hunt for the least costly PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD, then the Kingston NV2 will likely appear at the top of the list. Efficiency is more than sufficient for the typical user, however it’s not for pros banging on it with great deals of information.
Cost When Reviewed
250GB: $29.99 I 500GB: $43:99 I 1TB: $64.99 I 2TB: $139.99 I 4TB: $219.99
Finest Prices Today: Kingston NV2 SSD
https://www.pcworld.com/wp-content/themes/idg-base-theme/dist/static/img/amazon-logo.svg” alt=”Amazon” loading=”lazy”>
$29.99
$35
You will not discover a more economical PCIe 4.0 SSD than Kingston’s NV2. It’s slower than the huge bulk of its peers, however being NVMe, it’s still sufficient for many users and the majority of daily jobs.
Additional reading: See our roundup of the best PCIe 4.0 SSDs to find out about completing items.
What are the Kingston NV2’s functions?
The NV2 is a PCIe 4.0 x4, 2280 kind element (22mm large, 80mm long) M. 2, NVMe SSD using a DRAM-less (HMB/host memory buffer) style. The NAND is 144-layer Kingston-labeled QLC managed by a Silicon Motion SM2267XTV controller.
We checked the 1TB capability of the NV2, however ranked efficiency differs considerably by capability: For the 250GB capability it’s 3GBps reading/1.3 GBps composing, for the 500GB and 1TB capabilities it’s 3.5 GBps/2.1 GBps, and for the 2TB and 4TB capabilities its 3.5 GBps/2.8 GBps.
Jon L. Jacobi/ Foundry
The NV2 is warrantied for 3 years or 320TBW (terabytes that can be composed) per terabyte of capability. Those are paltry compared to most NVMe SSDs, and the low TBW is a telltale sign that the NAND is QLC.
That stated 320TBW per TB isn’t the most affordable ranking we’ve seen: The Sabrent Rocket Q4 Corsair MP600 Core Miniand Essential P3 — all QLC drives– are ranked for 225TBW/TB, 250TBW/TB, and 220TBW/TB, respectively.
You are taking a little bit of a possibility on the NV2 and QLC drives in basic, though endurance is typically comprehended to be higher (frequently substantially) than supplier TBW scores, which are considering monetary liability. Not just that, however the majority of users compose far less information than they believe.
Still, you didn’t believe you ‘d get Seagate-like support at these costs, did you? What costs are those? See listed below.
Just how much does the NV2 expense?
At the time of this composing the 25GB NV2 was $28, the 500GB was $38, our 1TB drive cost $52, the 2TB was $100, and the 4TB was $187– all on Amazon (Kingston’s MSRP is $10 to $30 greater). Those costs, folks, are a relative pittance.
How quick is the Kingston NV2?
All NVMe SSDs are quick– we are comparing the thoroughbreds of storage here. The NV2 is absolutely one of the slowest such gadgets we’ve evaluated. It ensconced itself conveniently in next-to-last location, simply ahead of the Important P3an extremely comparable style however just PCIe 3.0.
In point of truth, the NV2 is the slowest PCIe 4.0 SSD we’ve ever checked, and it’s not even especially close to the next slowest– the Solidigm P41 Plus
While slower than many, our 1TB NV2 really went beyond Kingston’s rankings (see above). Keep in mind that Kingston hesitated to complete our fact-check sheet, so we priced quote the rankings from the business’s site.
Jon L. Jacobi
Once again, the NV2 was off the NVMe efficiency speed in CrystalDiskMark 8’s 4K efficiency tests. Just the PCIe 3.0 Crucial P3 was slower, and not in every test.
Our 48GB transfers were a relative jaunt for the NV2, which ended up connected with, or in front of whatever however WD’s exceptional TLC SSD, the SN770MThese sort of copies are where most users will be observing a development bar, so have the most significant influence on efficiency fulfillment.
The 450GB compose was where the NV2 generally fell off an efficiency cliff, plunging to a typical compose speed of 140MBps when it lacked secondary (QLC composed as SLC) cache. Our test design was a 1TB drive, while all the others in the chart were 2TB with more NAND for secondary caching. No doubt, a 2TB or 4TB design would’ve completed with a more competitive time.
Listed below you can see the drop in continual compose speed highlighted. The small bumps are the periodic dive up to 400/500MBps. The NV2 invested most of the time at the slower rate.
Once again, I should mention that we’re talking NVMe here, which is far faster than any other kind of storage you’re most likely to use. Within those limits, you’re absolutely getting what you pay for. Or didn’t spend for, more exactly.
Should I purchase the Kingston NV2?
Yes, if you’re on a tight spending plan and can’t manage anything else. It’s likewise ideal for external storage where the USB and even Thunderbolt busses aren’t quickly sufficient to necessitate a top-tier SSD.
On the other hand, certainly avoid the NV2 if you’re a lover or prosumer frequently composing large quantities of information. It’s likewise not the optimum drive for running an os due to the fairly slothful 4K efficiency.
How we evaluate
Drive tests presently use Windows 11, 64-bit working on an X790 (PCIe 4.0/ 5.0) motherboard/i5 -12400 CPU combination with 2 Kingston Fury 32GB DDR5 4800MHz modules (64GB of memory overall). Both 20Gbps USB and Thunderbolt 4 are incorporated to the back panel and Intel CPU/GPU graphics are utilized. The 48GB transfer tests make use of an ImDisk RAM disk using up 58GB of the 64GB of overall memory. The 450GB file is moved from a 2TB Samsung 990 Pro which likewise runs the OS.
Each test is carried out on a recently formatted and TRIM ‘d drive so the outcomes are ideal. Keep in mind that in typical usage, as a drive fills, efficiency might reduce due to less NAND for secondary caching, along with other aspects. This is less of an element with the existing crop of SSDs with their far much faster NAND.
Caution: The efficiency numbers revealed use just to the drive we were delivered and to the capability evaluated. SSD efficiency can and will differ by capability due to more or less chips to shotgun reads/writes throughout and the quantity of NAND offered for secondary caching. Suppliers likewise periodically switch parts. If you ever discover a big inconsistency in between the efficiency you experience which we reportby all methods, let us understand.
Finest Prices Today: Kingston NV2 SSD
https://www.pcworld.com/wp-content/themes/idg-base-theme/dist/static/img/amazon-logo.svg” alt=”Amazon” loading=”lazy”>
https://www.pcworld.com/wp-content/themes/idg-base-theme/dist/static/img/walmart-logo.svg” alt=”Walmart” loading=”lazy”> $29.99
< img src="https://www.pcworld.com/wp-content/themes/idg-base-theme/dist/static/img/walmart-logo.svg" alt="Walmart" loading="lazy" >
$ 35
Author: Jon L. Jacobi
Freelance factor
Jon Jacobi is an artist, previous x86/6800 developer, and veteran computer system lover. He composes evaluations on TVs, SSDs, rush cameras, remote gain access to software application, Bluetooth speakers, and sundry other consumer-tech software and hardware.