Numerous cars and truck consumers just desire an automobile that’s useful, simple to drive and reasonably economical. High fuel economy is progressively a popular desire. If this seems like what you’re trying to find in your next automobile, think about the 2024 Kia Niro or the 2024 Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid.
The Kia Niro is fresh from a redesign in 2015. It’s one of Kia’s smaller sized crossover SUVs and it sticks out with its unique styling, basic hybrid powertrain and abundant innovation functions. Much of the very same can likewise be stated of Toyota’s Corolla Cross Hybrid. This fuel-sipping spinoff of the Corolla Cross is likewise fresh, presented simply in 2015. It’s likewise packed with popular functions and is a lot more useful than a routine Corolla sedan. Edmunds’ car professionals put these hybrid SUVs head-to-head to see which one provides more for your cash.
Under the hood of the Niro is a four-cylinder hybrid electrical powertrain that sends out 139 horse power to the front wheels. Throughout screening, Edmunds discovered velocity is quite leisurely. The Niro is happily punchy at city speeds however it quickly runs out of steam on the highway. The compromise is fantastic fuel economy. Depending upon the trim, its EPA-estimated integrated average is an exceptional 49 to 53 mpg.
Encouraging the Corolla Cross Hybrid is a 196-horsepower four-cylinder hybrid electrical powertrain that sends out power to all 4 wheels. That’s right, the Corolla Cross Hybrid comes requirement with four-wheel drive. Four-wheel drive is not readily available on the Niro. Its 42 mpg integrated typical tracks the Niro’s, yet velocity is more powerful. Edmunds discovered the Corolla Cross Hybrid required 7.9 seconds to run from absolutely no to 60 miles per hour– practically 2 seconds quicker than the Niro.
If excellent fuel economy is your leading concern, the Niro wins. Edmunds discovered the Corolla Cross Hybrid’s quicker velocity and basic all-wheel drive to be worth the compromise.
Winner: Corolla Cross Hybrid
Credit Kia and Toyota for packaging in numerous functions into these budget-minded SUVs. In base format, they each come requirement with keyless entry and ignition, an 8-inch infotainment touchscreen, and cordless connection for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto mobile phone combination. Both likewise provide a robust set of motorist help functions consisting of lane keeping support, blind-spot caution and adaptive cruise control.
There are a couple of elements that assist the Niro pull ahead. For one, it begins at $28,315, consisting of location charges. That’s about $1,200 less than the Toyota’s cost of $29,570. Kia likewise provides leading trim levels for the Niro that include high end functions such as aerated front seats and a premium stereo. You can’t get these on the Corolla Cross Hybrid.
The Niro is backed by a prolonged five-year/60,000-mile standard guarantee coupled with 10 years/100,000 miles of powertrain protection. Toyota uses a more market basic combination of 3 years/36,000 miles (fundamental) and 5 years/60,000 miles (powertrain), though it’s worth keeping in mind the Corolla Cross Hybrid has a two-year/25,000-mile complimentary upkeep strategy.
Winner: Niro
Both of these SUVs are maneuverable in city driving and fairly comfy throughout highway jaunts. The Corolla Cross Hybrid trips more efficiently over bumps, however otherwise they’re quite comparable for well-rounded convenience. Freight area is likewise comparable. You’ll have the ability to fit a good quantity of things behind the rear seats or fold them down to pack bigger products.
The Niro does have one huge benefit compared to the Toyota: rear legroom. Determining in at 39.8 inches, the Niro has almost 8 inches more than the rear boundaries of the Corolla Cross Hybrid. That additional area makes the Niro more comfy for taller teenagers or grownups being in back. Moms and dads requiring to set up large kid security seats will value it too.
Winner: Niro
The Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid is a strong and practical option. It tackles its service with a minimum of difficulty and feels developed to last. The Niro has much better fuel economy, included rear legroom and a more high end interior. It’s reasonable with a little style.
____________
This story was supplied to The Associated Press by the automobile site Edmunds. Nick Kurczewski is a factor at Edmunds.