In 2015, Apple debuted the iPhone 6S, which utilized a default file encryption system avoiding both Apple and federal government authorities from accessing information kept on the gadget. In 2016, a federal judge purchased Apple to offer technical help to open the iPhone utilized by one of the mass shooters in San Bernardino, California. Apple declined to comply.
Years later on, as the COVID-19 pandemic swept around the world in 2020, Apple and Google partnered to establish a contact tracing application that would gather details about users contaminated with the illness and alert those who they had actually touched with. The app would keep details about infection and contact personal, however some federal governments desired more gain access to. When Apple and Google decreased to supply this details, they triggered a dispute about the business’ duties for their clients’ individual privacy versus public health.
Most just recently, in September 2021, Apple chose to postpone running systems updates that consisted of functions to combat kid sexual assault. While numerous applauded Apple, others stressed that Apple’s brand-new functions ran the risk of weakening the personal privacy of all users.
As each of these circumstances unfolded, Apple CEO Tim Cook needed to think about both his obligations to worldwide federal governments and society, along with to Apple’s consumers, staff members, and investors. Harvard Business School senior speaker Henry McGee and teacher Nien-hê Hsieh talk about the stress in between personal privacy and security in their cases,”Apple: Privacy vs. Safety(A(Band (C.