It’s time to take an upgraded take a look at the video gaming efficiency of the Core i9-14900K and Ryzen 7 7800X3Dcomparing head-to-head AMD and Intel’s finest video gaming processors to see which one you need to purchase. We’ve got a series of brand-new video games to evaluate with, a few of which have actually gotten efficiency spots that we’ve yet to check such as Starfieldso we’re eager to see how these 2 compare.
As it stands now, you can buy the i9-14900K for $580while the 13900K which is the exact same CPUexpenses $550There’s the 13900KF for $520On the other side of the table, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an MSRP of $450, however nowadays you can discover it for as low as $360making it significantly less expensive than the Core i9.
It’s worth keeping in mind that the Core i9 is a lot more effective performance CPU. If you are getting into some core-heavy work as well as video gaming, then the Intel processor may be a much better option. AMD’s counteroffer there is the 7950X3D for ~$600which is typically much faster for performance work and can technically match the video gaming efficiency of the 7800X3D– if the thread scheduling is working– which isn’t constantly the case.
The 7950X3D isn’t a best option, though its efficiency is typically really great. Today’s focus is on video gaming, and for that, the 7800X3D is a far better fit in our viewpoint.
For screening, the 7800X3D was set up on the Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master utilizing BIOS variation F20a, in addition to DDR5-6000 CL30 memory. The 14900K was benchmarked on the MSI MPG Z790 Carbon Wi-Fi utilizing BIOS variation 7D89v19 (we must question, MSI, why do your BIOS modifications need to seem like they could be a 32″ 4K 144Hz screen?)…
The Intel system is likewise utilizing DDR5-7200 memory, and for graphics, we have the Asus ROG Strix RTX 4090 OC Edition utilized for benchmarking at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K.
Criteria
Beginning with Assassin’s Creed Miragethis video game has actually seen several spots given that our last test. There have actually likewise been a couple of GeForce motorist updates. Compared to our 14900K evaluation information, the Intel processor’s efficiency has actually enhanced somewhat, while the 7800X3D sees a 9% decrease. We’re unsure why that is, however as normal, we triple-checked the information, and it now appears AMD and Intel processors are more equally matched in this title.
Another criterion that’s altered here is the BIOS modification, so it would be extremely hard to identify the reason for Ryzen’s efficiency regression. At the end of the day, both processors are pressing the RTX 4090 to over 190 fps at 1440p, which is most likely sufficient.
The 7800X3D’s efficiency in Cyberpunk 2077 enhanced with the Phantom Liberty upgrade– well, it was truly the 2.0 upgrade, however they took place at about the exact same time. Anyhow, the 7800X3D now carries out truly well in this title, beating the 14900K by a 12% margin at 1080p, though both were GPU restricted to 150 fps at 1440p and after that 77 fps at 4K.
Next up, we have Horizon Zero Dawnwhere the 7800X3D was once again able to beat the i9, providing 12% more efficiency at 1080p and 10% more at 1440p. Surprisingly, even at 4K, the AMD processor had a small efficiency benefit, though we’re just speaking about a 4% margin here.
Proceeding to the Far Cry 6 outcomes, we once again discover the 7800X3D out in front, using 12% more frames at 1080p and 8% more at 1440p. Fact be informed, however, both CPUs are outstanding here, as you ‘d anticipate.
Efficiency in F1 23 is exceptional, and this one is close adequate to call a tie as the 7800X3D was simply 3% faster at 1080p, so a minimal distinction there.
ACC is a video game where the 3D V-Cache makes an enormous distinction, significantly increasing frame rates. Much so that the 14900K can’t truly complete, regardless of providing really excellent video gaming efficiency. Still, the 7800X3D is around 27% faster at 1080p and 1440p, which is a huge efficiency uplift, and even at 4K, the Ryzen processor is still providing 13% more efficiency.
The 7800X3D stays dominant in See Dogs: Legionpermitting the RTX 4090 to render as much as 15% more frames at 1080p. The 1440p outcomes rapidly ended up being GPU restricted, leading to a simple 4% uplift for the Ryzen processor and after that, naturally, no distinction at 4K.
Checking with A Plague Tale: Requiem, we see that the 7800X3D is using a 9% efficiency bump at 1080p and 6% at 1440p before the video game ends up being greatly GPU bound at 4K. Once again, both CPUs are providing extremely excellent efficiency here, so although the 7800X3D is quicker, for this specific title, both are more than quickly enough.
Next up, we have Star Wars Jedi: Survivorand both CPUs once again carry out exceptionally well in this title, providing strong 1% lows of over 150 fps at 1080p. Efficiency total is near adequate to call similar, so no clear winner here.
Do you require 170 fps to play Baldur’s Gate 3We do not believe so, however with the 7800X3D you can accomplish it, or 160 fps with the 14900K. Both appear respectable to us, however the Ryzen processor was 7% faster, so another win here for AMD.
Proceeding to the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III outcomes, and here we are utilizing the integrated criteria. Unusually, while the 14900K and 7800X3D are extremely uniformly matched for the typical frame rate, the Ryzen processor supplied much better 1% lows, up to 31% much better.
Even when maxed out, Homeowner Evil 4 is CPU restricted at 1080p and most likely 1440p. The 7800X3D was 7% faster, so a small enhancement with the AMD processor. Once again, with both rendering over 160 fps, efficiency was outstanding.
Next, we have Shadow of the Tomb Raiderwhich isn’t precisely a brand-new video game, however it’s still among the most CPU requiring video games we’ve stumbled upon. Checking in the town area of the video game, we discovered that the 7800X3D was 8% faster when comparing the typical frame rate and 12% faster for the 1% lows. At 1440p, the 1% low margin increased to 19%, as the 14900K drops off more than the 7800X3D does at the greater resolution.
The Callisto Protocol offers us with an unusual example of the 14900K beating the 7800X3D, where the Intel processor depends on 13% faster, seen when comparing 1% lows at 1080p. Even at 4K, the Intel CPU recovered a minor lead, so a win throughout the board here for the i9.
Overall War: Warhammer III does not appear to prefer either CPU, with efficiency equaling at all 3 evaluated resolutions. There isn’t much to talk about here, and we will promptly move along.
Hogwarts Legacy with ray tracing allowed is ruthless, as we’re taking a look at less than 80 fps at 1080p utilizing an RTX 4090. The 7800X3D depended on 8% faster, however we’re speaking about a 4 fps distinction, so general efficiency was extremely comparable utilizing either CPU.
Upon release, the 13900K was 20% faster than the 7800X3D in Starfieldwhich appeared unforeseen, however that was the preliminary efficiency. Fortunately, Ryzen’s weak efficiency in this title was attended to with a video game upgrade, and now the 7800X3D approximately matches the 14900K, routing by a couple of frames when comparing the typical frame rate however likewise providing a little much better 1% lows. Competitive efficiency in general.
The 14900K likewise pushed ahead by a little margin in The Last of United States Part Iwith 1% lows being 8% more powerful at 1080p, which is a sensible margin. Remarkably, the 7800X3D pushed ahead by a couple of frames at 1440p and even 4K, however in general, we’re taking a look at the very same video gaming experience utilizing either CPU.
Like a lot of the video games we’ve taken a look at, efficiency in Halo Infinite is really comparable utilizing either processor. The 7800X3D pushed ahead at 1080p with much better 1% lows, however in general, we’re taking a look at a comparable experience in this one.
Gunman 3 has actually constantly provided the very best outcomes with an Intel processor, and absolutely nothing has actually altered here, with the 14900K rendering 6% more frames at 1080p before the outcomes end up being greatly GPU restricted at 1440p and, obviously, 4K.
Last up, we have Spider-Man Remasteredwhere the 7800X3D is 7% faster than the 14900K, rendering 167 fps usually rather than 156 fps. With ray tracing made it possible for, this video game is exceptionally CPU minimal, which is why we’re taking a look at extremely comparable frame rates at all 3 evaluated resolutions.
Efficiency Summary
We’ve had a look at the 21 video games evaluated, and it appears the 7800X3D did overcome the 14900Kthough in general, the distinction wasn’t significant.
To learn precisely how they compare, we’ll take a look at the margins on a per-game basis and average it out. Do not stress, we understand what we’re doing …
At the 1080p resolution, as anticipated, the 7800X3D and 14900K are extremely uniformly matched, with the Ryzen processor quicker by simply 5% usually. There were a couple of examples of double-digit margins and one severe example in ACC, however as the 5% typical suggests, normally we’re taking a look at single-digit margins.
At the a little more GPU-limited 1440p resolution, the general margin is even smaller sized, simply 4% here.
We have the 4K information, which, in our viewpoint, is not extremely important for CPU screening. It’s typically greatly asked for, however when benchmarking the GPU, the CPU does not truly matter in nearly all video games, since you’re usually GPU restricted.
Power Consumption
Now, we require to go over power intake. While the video gaming efficiency in between the 7800X3D and 14900K is really comparable, and honestly unworthy stressing over, power use does vary significantly.
When determining overall system power usage while video gaming, the Core i9 taken in 30% more power, regardless of being a little slower total.
We’re speaking about an additional 130 watts usually here, which is a significant distinction for the CPU to make. One issue might be the power expense, which isn’t a huge offer all over, a minimum of not for individuals purchasing high-end CPUs and GPUs.
A larger issue though for those people residing in warmer environments, is heat output. Discarding an additional 130 watts into your space for the very same or somewhat lower video gaming efficiency is less than suitable. At the minimum, your air conditioning system will feel the effect.
And the Fastest Gaming CPU is …
Let’s now weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative, and we’ll begin with the Ryzen 7 7800X3Dtaking a look at this from the viewpoint of a player looking for high-end efficiency.
The pros for the 7800X3D consist of outstanding video gaming efficiency, perhaps class-leading, very great power performance– it’s a no-fuss option– providing out-of-the-box efficiency without the requirement to fret about memory timings. It’s simple to keep one’s cool, never ever throttles even with a fundamental cooler, and AM5 motherboards are now usually really budget-friendly. The AM5 platform uses an upgrade course, and it’s now really economical for a high-end video gaming CPU, dropping as low as $360.
When it comes to the cons, what are a few of the downsides of the 7800X3D as a video gaming CPU, specifically relative to the 14900KWe confess, we sat at our desk attempting to come up with one genuine disadvantage, and absolutely nothing entered your mind.
The very best response we might create was platform compatibility. If you’re on AM4, for instance, you’ll require to purchase a brand-new motherboard and memory to update to the 7800X3D. Most purchasers of the 14900K will deal with the exact same concern. The greatest drawback of the 7800X3D is its absence of compatibility with older platforms.
We’re not stating the 7800X3D is ideal. If you’re likewise dealing with core-heavy work, the 14900K will surpass it, and for that on AM5, you’re much better served by the 7950X3Dwhich has its own set of scheduling problems. For video gaming, the 7800X3D is almost perfect.
What about Intel’s Core i9-14900KThe apparent pro is that it’s really quick for both video gaming and efficiency. Overclocking headroom is generally non-existent however you do have a higher degree of memory tuning readily available which can enhance efficiency, though you’ll frequently invest more time tuning the memory than you will really video gaming, and verifying stability is a genuine discomfort.
Aside from that, we’re uncertain what the 14900K does much better than the 7800X3D. The cons consist of bad power use, with undervolting still disappointing Ryzen’s effectiveness. Preferably, a 360mm AIO or much better is needed to prevent throttling, particularly for performance, as it’s a really hot system. The LGA 1700 platform is likewise dead, so your next upgrade will without concern need a brand-new motherboard, and even if you do not care about the monetary investment, it’s more of a discomfort to update.
To make the 14900K practical, it requires undervolting, memory tuning, and excellent silicon quality. Getting the 14900K to frequently beat the 7800X3D in video games is a task, it’s a way of life option, so if you wish to invest more time in the BIOS than you do video gaming, it can be a great deal of enjoyable.
In all severity, stock the 14900K is an extremely quick video gaming CPU, definitely comparable to the 7800X3D. Its extreme power use and the end-of-life platform are substantial downsides. Of course, we enjoy hearing your feedback, so let us understand what you believe.