Spotify CEO slams Apple’s App Store changes; Apple fires back [U]

Spotify CEO slams Apple’s App Store changes; Apple fires back [U]

Update, 7:19 pm ET: In a declaration to 9to5MacApple fires back at Spotify’s claims.

“We’re delighted to support the success of all designers– consisting of Spotify, which has the most effective music streaming app on the planet. The modifications we’re sharing for apps in the European Union provide designers option– with brand-new alternatives to disperse iOS apps and procedure payments. Every designer can select to remain on the very same terms in location today. And under the brand-new terms, more than 99% of designers would pay the exact same or less to Apple.”


Apple is dealing with more criticism for its revealed its strategy about how it prepares to adhere to the Digital Markets Act in the European Union. After pushback from Legendary CEO Tim Sweeney and the Union for App Fairnessboth Spotify and Mozilla have actually likewise now come out versus Apple’s strategies.

“This is extortion, plain and easy,” composes Spotify CEO Daniel Ek. “Apple has actually proposed an impracticable option that designers would need to be locked into till completion of their services.”

Ek describes his problems with Apple’s statements in an articleBasically, he thinks that the mix of the brand-new 0.50 cent Euro charge and an absence of versatility around App Store in-app payments makes this a bad offer for many designers.

Apple is making a designer’s option in between the status quo and this brand-new program as hard as possible. Apple is now stating, ‘sure, we’ll let you connect out or use your own payment techniques … however you still owe us a commission for even doing that (plus that brand-new flat 0.50 cent Euro charge).’ This mix of charges indicates that, in a lot of circumstances, if your app is popular, you would pay the very same and even more to Apple than under the previous guidelines. Apple is making the DMA hurt much more for designers, tossing them an impracticable option that will suppress their organizations right away.

The criticism from Spotify follows the business teased its strategies to bring in-app purchases back to its iOS app. When it comes to whether that’s still in the cards, Ek states he’s not rather sure, which eventually it’s going to boil down to the European Commission.

Previously today, thanks to the clear language in the DMA, we shared how we prepare to use clients in the EU more option, more control and much better experiences. Today, that future is less clear. And it boils down to an essential concern: Will the European Commission follow through with its intent to right-size Apple’s abuse of power? Or will the DMA be good in theory, however in practice, have no substantive significance for a lot of designers?

All that is needed is implementing the extremely law numerous worked so difficult to achieve. The ball remains in your court, European Commissioners, and at last you need to decline this outright neglect of the extremely concepts you worked so tough to develop.

“But as Apple has actually simply revealed the world, they do not believe the guidelines use to them,” Ek continues. “Essentially, the old tax was rendered undesirable under the DMA, so they produced a brand-new one masquerading as compliance with the law.”

You can check out Ek’s complete post on the Spotify site

Mozilla’s action

In an interview with The VergeMozilla called Apple’s brand-new guidelines around web browser engines “as agonizing as possible” for Firefox. While Apple is opening the iPhone as much as third-party web browser engines for the very first time, representative Damiano DeMonte states Mozilla not delighted that the modification just uses in the European Union.

“We are still evaluating the technical information however are very dissatisfied with Apple’s proposed strategy to limit the newly-announced BrowserEngineKit to EU-specific apps. The impact of this would be to require an independent web browser like Firefox to construct and keep 2 different web browser executions– a problem Apple themselves will not need to bear.”

Apple’s propositions stop working to offer customers feasible options by making it as unpleasant as possible for others to supply competitive options to Safari. This is another example of Apple developing barriers to avoid real web browser competitors on iOS.”

Apple’s proposed modifications will be consisted of in iOS 17.4, which will be launched to the public in March.


Include 9to5Mac to your Google News feed.

FTC: We utilize earnings making automobile affiliate links. More.

Find out more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *