UPDATE: Texas Judge Issues Ruling In Case Of School District That Suspended Teen Due To Length Of His Locs

UPDATE: Texas Judge Issues Ruling In Case Of School District That Suspended Teen Due To Length Of His Locs

A Texas judge has actually provided a judgment when it comes to a school district that suspended a teen for the length of his dreadlocks. As The Shade Room formerly reported, the teenager, Darryl Georgewas at first suspended in September 2023.

RELATED:Household Reportedly Hires Lawyer After Texas School Suspends Black Teen For Refusing To Cut His Locs

More Details Regarding The Texas Judge’s Ruling

According to CNNthe judgment was made on Thursday, February 22. State District Judge Chap Cain III supposedly chose that the school’s suspension of Darryl George did not breach the state’s CROWN ACT.

The judge’s choice asserts that it is not illegal “for school gown codes to restrict a trainee’s hair length.”

The outlet reports that the George household did not provide a declaration to the media after the trial. A representative for the household spoke on their behalf.

“Darryl made this declaration, and informed me this directly with tears in his eyes, ‘All due to the fact that of my hair? I can’t get my education due to the fact that of hair? I can not be around other peers and enjoy my junior year, due to the fact that of my hair?'” representative Candice Matthews apparently informed press reporters, per CNN

According to Matthews, the George household is irate and puzzled by the choice. The teen will have to continue serving in-school suspension.

CNN reports that the George household eventually plans to appeal the judgment.

The School District Responds To The Ruling As Social Media Weighs In

According to the outlet, Greg Poole, the superintendent of the Barbers Hill Independent School District, has actually reacted to the judge’s judgment.

[The ruling] verified our position that the district’s gown code does not break the CROWN Act which the CROWN Act does not provide trainees unrestricted self-expression …

The U.S. Supreme Court just recently ruled that affirmative action is an infraction of the 14th Amendment and our company believe the very same thinking will become used to the CROWN Act,” Poole supposedly described.

The outlet reports that the CROWN Act was enacted in Texas on September 1, 2023. The legislation forbids the discrimination of different hairdos “frequently related to a specific race or culture.”

Over in The Shade Room’s remark arealots of users appear to disagree with the judge’s choice to apparently ignore the act.

Instagram user @danikaberry composed.

@adjoabasamoah, who is the THE CROWN Act Champion ‘and’ Scholar, and Co-Creator of the CROWN Coalition composed the costs and had it passed in the State of Texas. What took place today is an outrage!”

While Instagram user @mz_carmeldutchess included.

“Now it’s a Supreme Court problem. His household requires to intensify this”

Instagram user @jacmartinn composed.

“shi do not even sound best reading it”

While Instagram user @prettyred_india included.

“TX & & FL off my list it’s not about costs. Laws & & education play a roll in moving. I wan na move however it got ta make good sense for me & & my own.”

Instagram user @jtripnation composed.

“Please Please appeal this. Ain’t no chance in 2024 …”

Learn more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *